Making Oppositional Culture, Making Standpoint: a Journey into Gloria Anzaldúa’s Borderlands
نویسندگان
چکیده
The theory of oppositional culture, as discussed by Bonnie Mitchell and Joe Feagin (1995), suggests that African Americans, American Indians, and Mexican Americans draw on their own cultural resources to resist domination. Patricia Hill Collins suggests that Black women develop a unique vision of the social world based on their position within a matrix of domination that organizes intersecting oppressions of race, class, and gender, among others. Expression of this unique vision or standpoint, however, is rendered problematic within a matrix of domination organized via four domains of power—the structural, disciplinary, hegemonic, and interpersonal (Collins 2000). This article suggests that Gloria Anzaldúa’s writing—her storytelling, narratives, and poetry—is a significant form of oppositional culture and contributes to the achievement of a Chicana feminist standpoint within a matrix of domination as Anzaldúa shares tales of living in the borderlands. The paper provides a brief analysis of Anzaldúa’s Borderlands=La Frontera: The New Mestiza (1987).
منابع مشابه
Todas las voces que me hablan simultáneamente: Anzaldúa’s Voice from the Borderlands
This article analyses how Anzaldúa uses language intersections to underline the hybridity of Chicano women in Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza (1987). It starts by reflecting on how Anzaldúa exposes the use of language as a source of segregation and bias in the dominant society, as well as among Chicanos themselves, as the author reveals a connection between linguistic oppression and pa...
متن کاملMeasuring the Impact of Online Evidence Retrieval Systems using Critical Incidents & Journey Mapping
Online evidence retrieval systems are one potential tool in supporting evidence-based practice. We have undertaken a program of research to investigate how hospital-based clinicians (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals) use these systems, factors influencing use and their impact on decision-making and health care delivery. A central component of this work has been the development an...
متن کاملPatient engagement in healthcare: pathways for effective medical decision making
Making patients protagonists of decisions about their care is a primacy in the 21st century medical ethics. Precisely, to favor shared treatment decisions potentially enables patients’ autonomy and self-determination, and protects patients’ rights to make decisions about their own future care. To fully accomplish this goal, medicine should take into account the complexity of the healthcare deci...
متن کاملInvestigating the relationship between nurses' participation in clinical decision making and organizational culture in special wards of Iran University of Medical Sciences in 1399
Background and purpose: The nurse's ability to make an effective clinical decision affects the quality of care and differentiates professional nurses from non-professional ones. Many individual and organizational factors affect clinical decision-making of nurses. This study aims to examine the relationship between participation in clinical decision-making and organizational culture of nurses in...
متن کاملThe borderlands between science and philosophy: an introduction.
Science and philosophy have a very long history, dating back at least to the 16th and 17th centuries, when the first scientist-philosophers, such as Bacon, Galilei, and Newton, were beginning the process of turning natural philosophy into science. Contemporary relationships between the two fields are still to some extent marked by the distrust that maintains the divide between the so-called "tw...
متن کامل